1
A legal landmark has been reported in the case of adult film performer and OnlyFans creator Emily Willis, whose family claims she was left in a near-vegetative state due to alleged medical malpractice at a California treatment center.
Willis, born Litzy Lara Banuelos, was 25 when she entered Summit Malibu, a private rehab center in California, in January of 2024 to treat extreme addiction to ketamine. According to her family’s court documents, she had reportedly been shooting between five and six grams of ketamine daily before entering the clinic, a dose which they term as potentially lethal and indicative of a severe phase of substance use disorder.
Soon after she entered the facility, Willis suffered a cardiac arrest. The family of Willis blames the healthcare center staff for not providing timely and adequate medical care. From the court documents, Willis was alone for some undetermined period, until a nurse found her to be unconscious.
Emergency paramedics were summoned and administered CPR for 30 to 40 minutes. However, due to the extended deprivation of oxygen to her brain, Willis suffered extensive and irreversible brain damage. Her family alleges that she now suffers serious and permanent damage to her mental and physical functions.
Specific Charges of Misconduct: Abuse, Negligence, and Fraud Against Summit Malabi
The civil action, filed by Willis’s mother, brings both Summit Maluby and its parent company, Malibu Lighthouse Treatment Centers LLC, into court as defendants. The complaint lists several causes of action, including:
- Abuse of a dependent adult
- Professional negligence
- General negligence
- Fraudulent business practices
The plaintiff contends the defendants failed to follow California law on elder and dependent adult civil protection, did not exercise due care in caring for a medically vulnerable patient, and misrepresented themselves as qualified and able to deal with complicated cases of addiction.
“These are not minor flaws in care,” said James A. Morris Jr., the lawyer representing the family. “No patient should ever have to bear such a terrifying collapse in clinic care.”
Demurrer and Motion to Strike: June 2025 Procedural Hearing Fixed
A procedural hearing is scheduled before the Los Angeles Superior Court on June 18, 2025, that will determine the immediate course of the law case. The defendants will submit it on this day as two preliminary legal motions, a Demurrer and a Motion to Strike.
A Demurrer is a written exception that challenges the sufficiency of a complaint in law. In this case, the defendants will plead that even if all allegations are presumed to be true, Willis’s family’s supposed claims fail the legal standards to be submitted for trial. If the court finds so, it can either dismiss one or more claims without respect to the underlying facts.
The Motion to Strike, also submitted simultaneously, asks the court to exclude certain portions of the complaint as irrelevant, ambiguous, or legally unsuitable. Successful on this motion, the plaintiff’s action may be severely curtailed in scope or weakened before much discovery has even started.
These pre-trial motions are critical to the case and can determine whether it proceeds to a jury trial or is dismissed on technicalities.
Case Management Conference (CMC): Judicial Review of Core Disputes and Trial Readiness
In addition to the Demurrer and Motion to Strike hearing, the court will also conduct a Case Management Conference or CMC. This is an initial procedural hearing aimed at defining the principal legal and factual issues in dispute.
At the CMC, the judge will determine the complexity of the case, establish discovery deadlines, and consider any chance to streamline the litigation process. Depending on the June hearing outcome, the court may also invite alternative means of dispute resolution, including mediation.
The CMC is the judiciary’s first barrier to ensuring hassle-free litigation and helping in the fair resolution of civil disputes at a reasonable cost and without unnecessary delay.
Public Reaction and Broader Implications for the Private Rehabilitation Sector
Emily Willis was among the best-known names in the adult entertainment industry. Her untimely and tragic loss from public view has raised eyebrows and broader concern regarding the handling of addiction by the industry, especially high-end private facilities that advertise themselves as comprehensive and medically equipped.
Legal experts have said that the case could set new precedents for the duties of licensed rehab centers in the state of California, particularly when handling patients with serious medical vulnerabilities.
The case also raises the question of the quality of monitoring and accountability at these centers, some of which receive little regulatory scrutiny while caring for A-list clients.
Next Steps in Court: What the Hearing in June Can Signal for the Future of the Case
If the Demurrer and Motion to Strike are denied by the court, the defendants will be compelled to make formal pleadings to the allegations, and the case will proceed to the discovery stage, wherein both parties exchange evidence and undergo depositions.
If the court, on the other hand, decides that the claims have insufficient legal merit, the case could be partially or entirely dismissed, which would be a significant legal setback for the Willis family.
Regardless of the outcome, the June 18 hearing will mark a milestone in a case that potentially redefines measuring medical negligence within treatment for addictions. The ruling also has significant emotional and financial implications for a family requesting accountability for the life of a young woman whom they contend had her life ruined by preventable failures of medical care.
Additional developments in the case are to be announced after the June hearings.